Last week I reminded myself that I hadn’t sought out Cohen and Shires’ Telling Stories: A Theoretical Analysis of Narrative Fiction, which had been referenced in an article on game narrative. It was low down my list of priorities, mainly because it was written in 1988 – which feels like ancient history in citation terms. That shows in chapter one, where defining “narrative” as recounting “a story, a series of events in a temporal sequence,” the authors explain that:
our culture depends upon numerous types of narrative: novels, short stories, films, television shows myths, anecdotes, songs, music videos, comics, paintings, advertisements, essays, biographies, and news accounts.
Games aren’t mentioned, and I guess that’s no surprise, given that in 1988 computer games were still a relatively youthful medium, and the audience for games were relatively youthful too. The investment of Hollywood amounts of money in game narratives was still a twinkle in programmers eyes. If they looked at games at all back then, the authors might well have consciously excluded them from their analysis, because, the central premise of their book is “the events making up a story are only available to us through telling”, which might (arguably) exclude the procedurally generated narratives that most games provide.
But one of their ideas does have some relevance to game narratives. The article I looked at last week made reference to this passage (page 54):
From the vantage point of a completed sequence, events function either as kernels or as satellites. Kernel events raise possibilities of succeeding or alternative events – what we can call, taking the term rather literally, “eventuality.” They initiate, increase, or conclude an uncertainty, so they advance or outline a sequence of transformations. Satellite events, on the other hand, amplify or fill in the outline of a sequence by maintaining, retarding, or prolonging the kernel events they accompany or surround.
In game narrative terms this is a neat summary of how games work as a storytelling medium. In more scripted games such as Red Dead Redemption, the sequence of Kernals is quite rigid, and the satellites are optional or even (in the case of games like Skyrim) procedurally generated. I remember nearing the end of RDR: I’d helped John Marston, the character the game had been following, to track down and (mostly) kill his old buddies from the gang he had run with, and confront his old boss, who throw himself off a mountain. Marston had been given back his farm, and wife and child, and the game challenges had become less about death and destruction, and more about production and family life – rounding up cattle and and the like. Then a blicking icon had appeared on the game map, telling me that I was ready to play the nest kernel event.
I didn’t want to, I knew the game was nearing the end, and having discovered Marston’s life story, I knew it wouldn’t end well. I wanted to prolong the rural idyll of farming, hearth and home. So I found satellite quests to prolong the current kernel. I became obsessed with beaver hunting, promising myself I wouldn’t play on to the next kernal event until I’d found the five beaverskins a crazy glider pilot Marston had met in Mexico needed for his glue. I spent days and days hunting beaver. It became a running joke with my wife.
But after shooting the first two, it seemed the beavers had gone into hiding. There was beaver drought, it seemed, by every river in the gameworld – and yes I did try every one. So with a heavy heart, I turned John Marston back towards his fate. Damn, was I emotionally engaged.
But even in purely procedural games, the idea of kernels and satellites works. As Tynan Sylvester points out, in a game like The Sims, the narrative is reliant on the interpretation of the player:
This story was co-authored between the player and the game. The game simulated some simple event (attraction between redhead and roommate), and the player ascribed meaning to it (jealousy and frustration) the same way he might have for the Michotte balls, even though that emotion was not actually in the simulation. The next part of the story was cued by him when he orchestrated the murder. The game simulated the logistics of firey deaths, but the sense of sorrow and revenge was, again, ascribed completely by the player. Most of this story is apophenia – present of the Player Model, absent from the Game Model.
While not talking about games, Cohen and Shires manage to predict how the random calculations of a procedural game can become an emotionally engaging story:
While kernels may appear to function as primary events and satellites as secondary ones, satellites are as important as kernels to a story sequence. Furthermore, an event’s status as a kernel or satellite depends entirely upon a particular sequence and not on the event itself, which does not possess the ability to advance or amplify a transformation on its own. An event acquires its kernel or satellite function for a given sequence through its placement in the sequence, because the sequence is what sets the events in relation to each other.
I like to play Civilization, which is an example of unscripted, procedural game. Some games are more satisfying than others, when the random generation of events becomes, in my mind, the thrilling story a plucky little nation that could. Sometimes, despite my best efforts to manage my nascent state “events, dear boy, events” conspire to make the game boring – but the advantage of procedural games is that if its boring, you can start again. Well designed procedural games are the ones that keep you restarting because of the all the great narratives you’ve discovered on previous plays. Ones that are consistently boring don’t get restarted, they get turned off.
The challenge for cultural heritage sites is that they can’t be restarted, so a purely procedural approach of interactive narrative would not be constructive. Some degree of scripting – the selection and ordering of narrative kernals is required.
8 thoughts on “Kernels and Satellites”
Interesting post, but are you SURE cultural heritage games can never be restarted?
Sure cultural Heritage GAMES can be restarted, but what I said was “The challenge for cultural heritage SITES [emphasis added for this comment] is that they can’t be restarted” 🙂
ah I interpreted the **they** as referring back to games, my mistake.
“The challenge for cultural heritage sites is that **they** can’t be restarted, so a purely procedural approach of interactive narrative would not be constructive. Some degree of scripting – the selection and ordering of narrative kernals is required.’
But I guess I am now unclear what you mean by cultural heritage sites in relation to interactive narrative. Forgive me, it is early Saturday morning here and I don’t think I can explain my confusion easily.
NB Kernals / kernels and satellites remind me of how comedians always make sudden and surprising connections back to past jokes. They must multi-thread with the past in ways the public don’t. Perhaps drama (and dramatic irony) can work in a similar fashion.
Don’t worry – my own confusion about what I’m doing might be creeping into my posts. 😉
For a moment lets take everything ludic away from a cultural heritage site, be that a museum,archaeological site etc. It becomes a collection of objects, and the visitor becomes an agent, interrogating those objects for snippets of story that, (the visitor hopes) reveals some insight about, or makes some connection with, the cultural heritage.
The visitor may be helped by the layout and interpretation of the site, which orders their interrogation of the objects in a way that constructs an emotionally engaging story. BUT visitors may (usually) choose not to interrogate all the objects, or or to interrogate them in a order of their own choosing. This MAY, though the visitor’s prior knowledge. or random chance, reveal an equally (or even more) engaging story.
But if it doesn’t, the visitor can not restart the experience. Yes, they can go back to the beginning, but they have the weight of their experience so far weighing upon them. They risk walking away from the site unengaged, or worse, bored.
So, it seems to me, most (but not all) cultural heritage site-based games try to impose the kernels and satellites of a story onto the geography of the space and the objects. But I’m wondering if that’s the only way…
[…] knew there WAS an order, or that one would become apparent, because order is what turns events into kernels and facts into narrative. I wasn’t even sure how many narratives I’d find, but I […]
[…] of place. But the ephemeral stuff is not necessarily less important than the physical stuff, as Cohen and Shires pointed out, the only thing that distinguishes kernels from satellites is that the kernals have […]
[…] explain about Kernels and Satellites of course, but I need (I think) some sort of simple system of identifying how different story […]
[…] given guidance on timing. Note the importance even in this mostly improvised story, of having kernels – events that happen in order, even if its only the lights failing and the (spoilers!) […]